[Leonid Gauss Has successfully completed the online course Intermediate (200)Has successfully completed the online course Basics (100)]

1 year ago #38381

Hello,
can it be that when two BOs are set in succession in the ProcessDesigner, that in order for the second BO to be executed, a process output must necessarily be in the input of the second BO?

Many thanks in advance.

Greetings Leonid

[Jennifer Häfner Has successfully completed the online course Intermediate (200)Has successfully completed the online course Advanced (300)Has successfully completed the online course Basics (100)Has successfully completed the online course Advanced (310)Has successfully completed the online course Advanced (320)Has successfully completed the Intermediate CertificationHas successfully completed the Advanced Certification]

1 year ago #38468

Up

2

Down

::

Hi Leonid,

In addition to Christoph’s reply, I want to clarify that if the second BO does not have a required input, it should be executed after the first BO. It’s not necessary to define an input then.

If the second BO is not executed, you can check in the Logs & Monitoring section if the first BO runs into an error. Then, the process does not continue at the green output node of the first BO, and the second BO is not executed.

[Vitali Kurdasov Has successfully completed the online course Intermediate (200)Has successfully completed the online course Basics (100)Has successfully completed the online course Advanced (310)Has successfully completed the Intermediate Certification]

1 year ago #38417

Up

0

Down

::

Hello Leonid,

in order to use a output of a already called BO as an input for another BO you could use the “process output”-shape in the input mapping of the second BO.  

Also, if the input is not optional and it has to be set, than please use the switch in the input parameter section of the second BO and set “optional” to false.